Paper Published: The Implications of Interactions for Science and Philosophy

Reductionism has dominated science and philosophy for centuries. Complexity has recently shown that interactions—which reductionism neglects—are relevant for understanding phenomena. When interactions are considered, reductionism becomes limited in several aspects. In this paper, I argue that interactions imply nonreductionism, non-materialism, non-predictability, non-Platonism, and non-Nihilism. As alternatives to each of these, holism, informism, adaptation, contextuality, and meaningfulness are put forward, respectively. A worldview that includes interactions not only describes better our world, but can help to solve many open scientific, philosophical, and social problems caused by implications of reductionism.

The Implications of Interactions for Science and Philosophy

Update 2013-12-09
Finally got its volume number:
Foundations of Science
November 2013, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 781-790

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Five postdoctoral fellowships in complex systems, UNAM

Paper published: Urban Transfer Entropy across Scales

Bioinformatics Research Professor Position at UNAM