I've been away on holidays, but certainly things haven't been easy in Mexico these weeks, in spite of the silence of the international media.
After the massive fraud on July 2nd and the days afterwards, the right-wing candidate Felipe Calderón had a lead of about half percent of the votes. The federal electoral tribunal ordered a recount of 9% of the booths, where irregularities were abundant: votes for López Obrador were subtracted, votes for Calderón were added, and in general more than half of the checked packaged had been fiddled.
In the last ten years, the electoral tribunal had always nullified electoral booths with such inconsistencies, since it is impossible to know how many votes there were originally. If the booths with irregularities in this election were cancelled, López Obrador would have an easy victory. Note that in the remaining 91% of booths that were not recounted certainly there were further irregularities. In spite of its own jurisprudence, in spite of admitting that president Vicente Fox illegally favoured the candidate of his party, in spite of admitting that there had been electoral fraud, in spite of admitting that there had been foul play by the federal electoral institute and high business circles, this week the tribunal declared Calderón as elected president.
Rumor has it that president Fox pressed the tribunal members two weeks ago to ratify Calderón at the house of the president of the supreme court, "to avoid a political and economic crisis" (In Mexico the executive and judicial powers should be separated, so if this turns out to be the case, it would be an anticonstitutional act the president and the magistrates).
A real crisis is looming precisely because of the imposition of Calderón. In spite of attempts by most media, a large part of the population is aware of the fraud, and if the government broke all possible laws to put Calderón on the presidential chair (we'll see later who pulls the strings), we will not recognize him as president.
On September 1st, Fox had to give his last government report to the Congress. Weeks beforehand, police and army surrounded the Congress building to prevent any demonstration during the report. However, the PRD deputies (supporting López Obrador), took the stage in Congress, decided not to go down until the siege was lifted, since they were not able to legislate freely. Fox just delivered his written report and left the building. This is the first time a president is not able to give a speech with his report. Calderón would take possession on December 1st before the Congress. Will he be able to do so?
The media are trying to disregard everything that is going on. However, the situation is VERY similar to the one that preceded the Mexican Revolution in 1910:
- Wealth differences with a high poverty rate. Then, the government of Porfirio Días managed to bring peace, foreign investments, and industrial revolution to the country, generating wealth for several people, but leaving the majority of the population in poverty, exploited in factories and haciendas. Now, Neoliberal economic policies since 1982 have made the rich richer and the poor poorer, to the point where money sent from Mexican immigrants living in USA constitutes the second source of income to the country, after oil.
- Population violently repressed. Then miners in Cananea and workers in Río Frío. Now peasants in Atenco and teachers in Oaxaca, where people have been killed and women captured by the police raped.
- An alternative candidate is attempted to be left out of the elections. Then Francisco I. Madero was imprisoned. Now Andrés Manuel López Obrador was almost in jail, but huge demonstrations supporting him forced Fox to give him "presidential pardon"
- Electoral fraud. Then Porfirio Díaz was reelected for the 7th time, even when Madero had won. Now Calderón is imposed as president even when López Obrador won the elections.
Now, let us hope that, unlike the Revolution, there will be no chaos and not more than one million deaths. Up until now the movement has been pacific. Another historical similarity is given with the civil war, where liberal elected president Juárez was faced to leave Mexico City, while the conservative party, with help from Napoleon III, imposed Maximilian of Habsburg (who ironically was a liberal at heart) as Emperor of Mexico. Now, Spain and USA support Calderón, for their interests are aligned. That would explain why newspapers of those countries are attacking feverishly López Obrador.
It is interesting to note that USA supported the "Orange Revolution" in Ukraine, in the name of freedom (well, they can't say anymore it's in the name of the Cold War, even when it was in the name of "let's kick Russia's interests"), and also in Haití. Why are they hypocritically silent about the evident fraud in Mexico, even when the practices of Calderón's party ressemble those of fascist Germany? Well, of course because they don't want more leftist governments in Latin America. But what they don't see is that this path leads to more conflict and economic instability, since the people will not resist much longer the oppression.